BUSINESS & ACCOUNTING · FINANCIAL MODELLING
Five checks before sharing a financial model
A transparent model lets the reader distinguish inputs, calculations and decisions.
In this blog
State the question
Describe the decision, time horizon and intended audience in one short note. A cash forecast, an operating budget and a valuation serve different purposes. This blog suggests an internal review method rather than a required reporting format.
Separate inputs from formulas
Use a clearly identified assumption area with units and dates. Keep source references alongside significant inputs. If a percentage changes halfway through the model, make the timing explicit rather than hard-coding it in an isolated formula.
Reconcile the starting point
Check the opening balances against the agreed records. Confirm that schedules reconcile to their summaries and that transfers are not counted twice. A neat chart cannot resolve a difference in the source data.
Test the edges
Try a zero-growth case, a delayed receipt and a cost increase. Check whether totals and cash balances move in the expected direction. Record which risks are outside the model, including uncertainty that cannot be represented by one constant assumption.
Make the handover readable
Label the version, review date and unresolved issues. Provide a short explanation of what changed since the previous version. Preserve an approved copy so a later reader can reproduce the discussion. Where outputs feed financial statements, check the relevant reporting standards separately; a scenario calculation does not establish the accounting treatment.
Publication, content edits and source review are separate records. A content update does not certify a legal review. Check current law, notifications and portal guidance for your relevant period before acting.
